The “7-53” fingerboard protocol – quick summary
- The “7-53” climbing finger strength routine
- A very time-efficient and effective finger strength training protocol
- Similar to MaxHangs, but with shorter rests
- The “7-53” fingerboard protocol details
- The “7-53” finger strength protocol summary table
- Eric Hörst’s “7-53” hangboard routine remarks
- Eric Hörst’s “7-53” strength protocol conclusions
- Over the years Eric Hörst progressed from 22.5 kg to 41 kg added weight on a 14 mm edge.
- Highly recommended for both intermediate and advanced climbers
- Great preparation for the more strenuous one arm hangs
- Eric’s favorite hangboard routine!
The “7-53” climbing finger strength routineThe “7-53” hangboard routine, was developed by Eric Hörst to effectively train maximum finger strength for rock climbing. The idea behind the 7-second time under tension (TUT) and the 53-second rest was explained in the T4C podcast . According to Eric, full recovery between two maximum hangs takes about 3 minutes and is divided into two phases . In phase one, which is 50 seconds long, the mitochondria resynthesize ATP to restore phosphocreatine (PCr) intercellular stores. This phase is crucial, and it’s enough to allow completion of at least another two hangs. The second phase, which takes the remainder of the 3 minutes, is not as important for strength training. These short 53-second rest intervals between three consecutive hangs are practically the only thing that distinguishes the “7-53” hangboard routine from the Eva López MaxHangs protocols, where the rest times between each hang are always three to five minutes .
Figure 1: PCr restoration dynamics according to .
The “7-53” fingerboard protocol details
- Choose two to five different grip positions. Consider including:
- Half crimps
- Full crimps
- Three-finger pockets
- Two-finger pockets: index-middle (IM), middle-ring (MR) and ring-pinkie (RP) – advanced
- Deep monos
- For each grip position determine the amount of added or subtracted weight, allowing you to hang for 10 seconds.
- For each grip position:
- Hang for 7 seconds, rest for 53 seconds.
- Complete a total of 3 hangs per set.
- Rest 3 – 5 minutes and switch to the next grip position.
- Complete a total of 2 – 5 sets.
|The “7-53” protocol|
|Hang test time [s]||10|
|Sets||2 – 5|
|Hang time [s]||7|
|Rest betw. Sets [min]||3|
|TUT [s]||42 – 105|
|Total time [min]||9 – 27|
Table 1: The “7-53” finger strength protocol summary.
|The "7-53" protocol|
|Hang test time [s]||10|
|MVC-7 load||92 - 97%|
|Sets||2 - 5|
|Hang time [s]||7|
|Rest betw. hangs [s]||53|
|Rest betw. sets [min]||3|
|TUT [s]||42 - 105|
|Total time [min]||7- 23|
Eric Hörst’s “7-53” hangboard routine remarks
- The number of sets can be varied between 2 – 5.
- Recommended holds:
- 14 – 20 mm edges
- 20 – 30 mm two-finger pockets
- Deep tendon-friendly monos
- Initially focus on training the half crimp and open hand pocket positions.
- If you can’t complete all the hangs, reduce weight.
- Advanced climbers may consider:
- Adding a second set for each full crimp and half crimp grips;
- Doing additional sets of two-finger pockets (open hand) and pinch grips.
Figure 2: Screenshot from a “7-53” hanboard routine training session video.
Eric Hörst “7-53” strength protocol conclusionsYou can see that Eric is incorporating the concept of the 3-second margin (effort level) into his protocol. The same idea is used by Eva López in her MaxHangs protocols . According to Eric, the “7-53” protocol is very time-efficient; it takes only 12 minutes to go through three full sets. He claims to have improved from 22.5 kg to 41 kg added weight on a 14 mm edge over the years, and that this method is excellent preparation for one-arm hangs . This high-intensity-low-volume approach is consistent with the results of recent research, where it was shown that increasing the exercise volume does not necessarily lead to higher strength gains .
- E. Hörst, Training4Climbing Podcast #10: Maximum Strength Fingerboard Training’, Mar. 1, 2017. (link)
- Layec, G., Bringard, A., Vilmen, C., Micallef, J.-P., Le Fur, Y., Perrey, S., Cozzone, P.J., Bendahan, D., 2009. Does oxidative capacity affect energy cost? An in vivo MR investigation of skeletal muscle energetics. European Journal of Applied Physiology 106, 229–242. (link)
- Cooke, S.R., Petersen, S.R., Quinney, H.A., 1997. The influence of maximal aerobic power on recovery of skeletal muscle following anaerobic exercise. European Journal of Applied Physiology 75, 512–519. (link)
- Eva López Blog – Fingerboard Training Guide (II). Maximal grip Strength and Endurance Methods and Load Training management, May 23, 2018. (link)
- J. Banaszczyk, StrengthClimbing – Eva López MaxHangs hangboard